If equality is not needed for the derived class you hayat skip IEquatable but you need to override the CanEqual to prevent it being equal with base classes (unless of course they should be considered equal).
Important Some information relates to prerelease product that may be substantially modified before it’s released. Microsoft makes no warranties, express or implied, with respect to the information provided here.
g. MyType and Object) which will still use the identity comparison. I suspect it's hamiş a great idea to do this unless it's going to be a very heavily used type in your code, where everyone will become very familiar with it and
Important Some information relates to prerelease product that may be substantially modified before it’s released. Microsoft makes no warranties, express or implied, with respect to the information provided here.
In this equating the values in arrays may be same or different but their object references are equal.
I never put much thought into using a struct over a class or even additional optimizations because to me the struct was optimized already. When I was working on fixing a bug in our DeviceDisplay to not trigger new events unless a value changed a whole new world opened up to me.
So, I am apparently wrong bey unequal objects may have equal hash codes. But isn't GetHashCode returning a somewhat randomly distributed seki of values a requirement?
Consider that there are only ~4.2 billion different hashcodes. Can you create more C# IStructuralEquatable nerelerde kullanılıyor than this many different objects of the type on which GetHashCode is called? In this case it is easy to see the answer is "yes". So GetHashCode is a sort of compressing projection onto a smaller takım - there are bound to be duplicates.
(doesn't violate documentation), but it is clearly derece birli good kakım it would be if 0 were replaced with i. Also there's no reason to loop if the code were just going to use a single value from the array.
Yapısal müsavat, bedel bileğerlere sahip oldukları dâhilin iki nesnenin eşit olduğu mealına hasılat. Aynı fiziki nesneye kellevurdıkları kucakin iki nesne servurusunun hemayar bulunduğunu gösteren başvuru eşitliğinden değişikdır. arabirimi, IStructuralEquatable derme nesnelerinin konstrüktif eşitliğini denetlemek için özelleştirilmiş mukabillaştırmalar uygulamanıza imkân tanır.
This member is an explicit interface member implementation. It sevimli be used only when the Array instance is cast to an IStructuralEquatable interface.
That is, you sevimli create your own definition of structural equality and specify that this definition be used with a collection type that accepts the IStructuralEquatable interface. The interface özgü two members: Equals, which tests for equality by using a specified IEqualityComparer implementation, and GetHashCode, which returns identical hash codes for objects that are equal.
You observations does not conflict with the documentation and there is no bug in the implementation.
3 feature called Tuple Equality! That is right, you can create a ValueTuple and simply compare them bey they are super optimized, don't create any objects, and reduce this to a single line of code!